Home ยป Questions ยป Wordpress.. Is it a CMS?

Wordpress.. Is it a CMS?

Answered Closed
1
9

I recently was contacted by a client who simply wanted to increase their organic rankings in Google. My approach was to do the following:

A) Take them off of their overpriced host and move them to a nicer, cheaper, more feature-rich hosting solution which included a simple Wordpress install.

B) Apply a theme to WordPress which followed the look and feel of their existing website.

C) Train my client on how to login to their copy of Wordpress and create/manage pages/posts.

This took me very little time.. Most of the work in converting asp forms into php and tweaking a theme to fit their design.

Now my client is able to create/manage as many pages or posts as they desire.

I believe, for this purpose, Worpress was the easiest solution.

Would you categorize Wordpress as a CMS?

Similar:

External:

NOTE: This question was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by madcolor

  • Theresa
    Of course it is. What does it do if not manage content? As Wikipedia says, "WordPress is a free and open source blog publishing application and content management system."

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Nosredna

  • You must to post comments
Good Answer
1
0

WordPress is a system that allows you to manage content. That makes it a content management system. A simple one, perhaps, but one nonetheless. Plenty of people are using it in a CMS role.

For obvious reasons, its utility as a CMS for any given project depends greatly on the project involved. You wouldn’t want to run Microsoft.com or CNN.com on it, for example.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by ceejayoz

  • Wendy
    isn't CNN.com run on a modified version of Wordpress?

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by chris

  • Andrew
    I don't believe so. Their blogs are, but not the main site.

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by ceejayoz

  • Richard
    By your definition the popular forum vBulletin is a CMS because its posting structure can be manipulated into being a CMS.

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Mike B

  • Andrew
    Yes, vBulletin is a CMS. It is a system for managing content. There are even modules to add in more conventional CMS functions to vB.

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by ceejayoz

  • David
    Mashable.com runs on Wordpress...

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Beto Frega

  • You must to post comments
0
0

Yes, obviously its a CMS, among some other popular Web control management systems like Drupal and Joomla.
It is designed to simplify the publication of web content to web sites and mobile devices โ€” in particular, allowing content creators to create, submit and manage contents without requiring technical knowledge of any Web Programming Languages or Markup Languages such as HTML or the uploading of files.
Kudos to Matt Mullenweg’s Wordpress, a mojority of people across the globe have been facilitated by rich means to develop their small-scale sites with ease. And thats the point of a CMS.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Kunal Vyas

  • demo
    this is my comment
  • You must to post comments
0
0

I would say Wordpress was originally built as a blogging platform but the underlying architecture made it possible for people to use it as a CMS. Initially, when we started we only used wordpress as a blog but now we are using it as following:

  • Blog
  • Real Estate Site
  • Magazine Layout
  • Ecommerce Store
  • Coupon Site

And lots of other different needs. Wordpress XML RPC made it easier for us to push data back and forth while creating any PHP application. All the other Mambo Jambos are too complex and only serve as a CMS where in Wordpress you can do a lot.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Katie

  • You must to post comments
0
0

Sure, WordPress is a CMS for definition, from last release it has:

  • A very flexible system for taxonomies
  • Feature for create new types of Post
  • Wide community of developers , and plugins that extends its base functionality

But i think that its use should be as publishing system / editorial system , first for its plugins system based on filters/action hooks that are great for little change but very tedious for develop large component , then for example not support a linear template system for backend , also manage forms and data input in the page should be rivisited.
This is only my opinion.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Emiliano M.

  • You must to post comments
3
0

Good CMS. Easy to deal with. He has to take care and install new versions regulary to keep the punks away but otherwise a good choice.

You may want to tell your customer as well that just having a wordpress installed won’t increase the page rank – Content increases the page-rank and lets people come back to the site.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Nils Pipenbrinck

  • You must to post comments
4
0

I think this pretty much sums it up. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Is Wordpress a CMS? Who cares.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by jamisonLikeCode

  • You must to post comments
1
0

In my view – bogging systems are a subset of content management systems. So, Wordpress is one of that kind.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by user162247

  • You must to post comments
2
0

I believe, like many other posters here, that WordPress is a CMS by definition of what it can do/does. A limited CMS maybe, but most clients that I build WordPress sites for would never come anywhere near those limitations.

In my experience, it has worked well for me as an extensible, customisable, simple CMS for most client sites.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by davemac

  • You must to post comments
0
0

This took me very little time.. Most of the work in converting asp
forms into php and tweaking a theme to fit their design.

That is: your expertise (distinct from capabilities of a system).

create/manage pages/posts.

That is: an expression of the extent of your client’s use of the system.

I don’t use WordPress but from Google I see that it describes itself as a

Blog Tool and Publishing Platform

and that does seem to fit your client’s requirements.

My own choice of CMS (Plone) was informed by the ’roundness’ of the software and community, and the degrees to which the system truly manages a broad and extensible range of content — without dragging me into system management issues.

Personally, I would not describe WordPress as a CMS. But that’s not a criticism ๐Ÿ™‚

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Graham Perrin

  • You must to post comments
2
0

WordPress is a CMS, but it’s perhaps best used when your content is effectively like a blog. For small sites that you have to hand over to clients, it’s ideal, since the user interface is very easy to use.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Philip Morton

  • You must to post comments
4
0

OK, Let’s see how I get voted down by all Wordpress fans by giving a negative answer. Wordpress is probably the best solution out there for publishing content, whether it is a blog or not. However, I don’t think it is a CMS.

For me a CMS must give you the option to create a web application, not just a web site with content. By web application I mean ability to add various forms for collecting user input, have public users and profiles on the site, maybe sell some products (e-commerce module), manage the URLs of your pages/resources, have metadata about them, manage and have a workflow for media and non-text resources, have the ability to extend and customize the system to your needs. I don’t see these features in WordPress. And there are of course many more enterprise-level features that would be normal in a CMS but are missing from WordPress.

So I know how much users like Wordpress, and in fact it is a very good content publishing platform. But not a full-featured CMS.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Slavo

  • Linda
    Though I am a fan of wordpress, I wanted to drop you a line. I understand what you are trying to communicate but ceejayoz, I think, is closer to the definition of "CMS". Wordpresses first function is a blogging platform but also could be used as a business website CMS. Best Regards!

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Frank V

  • Tracy
    All those features can be added on pretty easily. There's several ecommerce plugins and also several to collect user data (cforms, contact form 7, etc).

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by J Lee

  • Dennis
    @fewpeople How can I easily add non-admin public users to a Wordpress site (which still have to log in to see content, but not log into the backend)? How can I easily add content approval workflow? Please, enlighten me.

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Slavo

  • You must to post comments
1
0

In its default setting, no, WordPress is not a CMS, it is a Blogging platform.

However, like with any other popular scripts (vBulletin, phpBB, Coppermine, etc) they can be tweaked and modified to your hearts content. If you add the necessary plugins and modify the template to look like a website and not a Blog then you effectively have a CMS that’ll allow you to publish new pages as WordPress Pages or Posts.

WordPress is as much a CMS as vBulletin or phpBB, so to those who seem to disregard my opinion, please explain why WordPress is a CMS and how come we don’t just call everything that handles content a CMS?

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Mike B

  • You must to post comments
0
1

Wordpress is a CMS. It did started as a blog centered software, but now includes many CMS features. It is listed in wikipedia List of content management systems and won a Packt Open Source CMS Award.

Wikipedia defines Content management system as a system which may support the following features:

  • identification of all key users and their content management roles;
  • the ability to assign roles and responsibilities to different content categories or types;
  • definition of workflow tasks for collaborative creation, often coupled with event messaging so that content managers are alerted to changes in content (For example, a content creator submits a story, which is published only after the copy editor revises it and the editor-in-chief approves it.);
  • the ability to track and manage multiple versions of a single instance of content;
  • the ability to capture content (e.g. scanning);
  • the ability to publish the content to a repository to support access to the content (Increasingly, the repository is an inherent part of the system, and incorporates enterprise search and retrieval.);
  • separation of content’s semantic layer from its layout (For example, the CMS may automatically set the color, fonts, or emphasis of text.).

While having very limited workflow, wordpress does support most of those features.

For more complex scenarios, people usually prefer a more powerful CMS such as Drupal. I tried both and usually goes with wordpress where possible.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by zvikara

  • Dennis
    The fact that it is listed in Wikipedia's list does not make it a CMS. Features do.

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Slavo

  • Joanne
    Actually, I'd think the acronym defines it quite simply.. Content (yes) Management (yes), System (yes). Together now.. Content Management System (x).

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by madcolor

  • You must to post comments
2
0

Yes as CMS = Content Managed System which is exactly what wordpress does, allows you to manage content on multiple pages of varying types. Yes it may be specialised for blogging although as you’ve pointed out this can be easily manipulated for other means.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Toby Mills

  • You must to post comments
8
0

Wordpress is a specialised CMS. While you can coerce it into a more generalised role, you are probably better off choosing a more general CMS if you are doing more than blogging.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by Jim

  • Gerald
    Back in September 2008 when you answered this I'd definitely agree. For those who are reading this now, WordPress 3.0 adds Custom Post Types and standard Menu Management which makes WordPress a much better solution for CMS than it used to be and, IMO, better than almost any other solution for ~80% of needs.

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by MikeSchinkel

  • You must to post comments
-1
0

no, Wordpress is a blog. If you want a CMS, you need to look to XOOPS, Drupal, Plone, Mambo or similar.

Whilst many of these things overlap in functionality, there’s a lot more available in the CMSs that the blog-type apps wouldn’t want to provide/support.

Bottom line though – if the user is happy with the new system, who cares what it is.

NOTE: This answer was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by gbjbaanb

  • Andrew
    I find the "better" CMSes are often more complicated, which makes them overkill for many smaller projects. So many sites just require a few mostly-static pages, a news page, an image gallery or two, etc., and WordPress is a nice and easy way to provide that.

    NOTE: This comment was originally posted at StackOverflow.com by ceejayoz

  • You must to post comments
Showing 16 results